Hinduism will be adversely impacted if temples and mutts restrict entry on grounds of separate denominations inside a religion, Supreme Court says.
State can step in under article 25(2)(B)
The nine-judge Constitution Bench was responding to submissions of senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan that article 26(b) over 25(2b). The court did not agree with the supremacy of art 26(b) over 25(2b). Justice Nagarathna said that the State can step in under article 25(2b) to ensure access to temples to all sections.
Specificity of denomination not good : the court
* Vaidyanathan, for the devotees of Lord Ayyappa of Sabarimala temple, submitted that they constitute a separate religious denomination and hence have the right to manage the temple's affairs
* To his submission, Justice Nagarathna said, ".....if you say only my denomination will attend the temple, that is not good for Hinduism".
Tailpiece.
Got up at 5, sent all the messages, opened up the house for the day, lit up the puja room lamp and switched on the hymns on the home theatre.
Morning cuppa with everyone.
Bath followed by breakfast of masala dosa and coffee.
Worked on my laptop.
A boisterous lunch, a bit of "Snehakkoottu" followed by siesta.
Padmakumar, Rema and Achu returned to Thrippunithura; enroute they'd dropped our maid at the Chavakkad bus stand. Had handed over the 'Vishukkaineettam" to the three of them!
A quiet evening.