The Pakis are in New Delhi for talks at the Foreign Secretary level. Soon after their arrival, they go into a huddle with the representatives of the separatist groups - funded by them - like Geelani, Mirwaiz Umer etc, fully aware of the fact that it irks India.
They'd done the same thing in the past with scant regard to diplomatic propriety and without clearance from the Indian side, for such meetings. Why're the Pakis hell bent on embarrassing us and why do I get this impression that they're never serious in problem resolution, once they come on to the negotiating table with India? Their anti-Indian mindset, driven by their army, is the cornerstone of their foreign policy. But tending to be a failed state, with every system crumbling and bringing in a chaotic situation, should they be doing this? They should be more worried about rejuvenating the country with thriving institutions that would sustain their fragile and nascent democracy, so that Pakistan comes out of the clutches of the terrorists and fundamental groups. What India cherishes is a strong and healthy neighbour that genuinely pulls along with her to strengthen the South Asian region!
And what's the standing of small men like Geelani or Mirwaiz Umer among the people of Jammu & Kashmir when their unprincipled and diabolical stand about their welfare is all too well known? They've enjoyed the privileges of being Indians but mouth vitriolic language and stir unrest among the people of J&K against India, to stay in contention. What sort of human beings are they who do not care a damn about their countrymen?
The unholy nexus between the two is not very difficult to dissect. But what they do not realise is that they're never going to succeed in their endeavour.
My take.
Are we gluttons for punishment? Why do we tolerate shabby diplomatic behaviour from anyone, for that matter? Why can't we send the team back saying that we've suspended the talks because of their unacceptable behaviour?
And we need to expose the double game being played by Geelani and co, to render them irrelevant!
They'd done the same thing in the past with scant regard to diplomatic propriety and without clearance from the Indian side, for such meetings. Why're the Pakis hell bent on embarrassing us and why do I get this impression that they're never serious in problem resolution, once they come on to the negotiating table with India? Their anti-Indian mindset, driven by their army, is the cornerstone of their foreign policy. But tending to be a failed state, with every system crumbling and bringing in a chaotic situation, should they be doing this? They should be more worried about rejuvenating the country with thriving institutions that would sustain their fragile and nascent democracy, so that Pakistan comes out of the clutches of the terrorists and fundamental groups. What India cherishes is a strong and healthy neighbour that genuinely pulls along with her to strengthen the South Asian region!
And what's the standing of small men like Geelani or Mirwaiz Umer among the people of Jammu & Kashmir when their unprincipled and diabolical stand about their welfare is all too well known? They've enjoyed the privileges of being Indians but mouth vitriolic language and stir unrest among the people of J&K against India, to stay in contention. What sort of human beings are they who do not care a damn about their countrymen?
The unholy nexus between the two is not very difficult to dissect. But what they do not realise is that they're never going to succeed in their endeavour.
My take.
Are we gluttons for punishment? Why do we tolerate shabby diplomatic behaviour from anyone, for that matter? Why can't we send the team back saying that we've suspended the talks because of their unacceptable behaviour?
And we need to expose the double game being played by Geelani and co, to render them irrelevant!
No comments:
Post a Comment